Re: What do y'all think?

http://www.amazon.com/Perfectly-Legal-Campaign-Benefit-Everybody/dp/1591840198

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:48 AM, "Bill Tew" <billtew@gmail.com> wrote:

> Send me the title. Kindle?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Jeffrey Little <jlittle@fncinc.com> wrote:
>
>> Haha...it was a joke, not intended as a useful analogy. Rove is a politician, you know his views are going to be one sided. Krugman on the other hand is an world renowned economist, albeit a liberal. Ive got a book I'd like you to read on the us tax code...non partisan discussion of the shaping of the tax code over the last 30 years, and the net effect of that on you and me. I'm looking forward to the ride too.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:13 AM, "Bill Tew" <billtew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is the same Karl Rove who along with most of the rest of the worlds leaders was in error. That is not a useful analogy however as the 2 issues are materially different. What are good examples? Because Obama was in Reverend Wright's church he is wrong on Gitmo? Because Tiger Woods cheated on his wife he is not a good golfer? I'll read the stuff below when I get to work this morning. Ah, Paul Krugman! Because he is a lib he is always wrong?? Don't think so. Looking forward to the ride.
>>>
>>> bt
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:02 58, Jeffrey Little wrote:
>>>
>>>> Isn't this the same Karl Rove that said there were weapons of mass destruction? :)
>>>>
>>>> Here's a different perspective:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/opinion/15krugman.html?src=me&ref=general><http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/opinion/15krugman.html?src=me&ref=general>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/opinion/15krugman.html?src=me&ref=general
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 15, 2011, at 5:25 AM, "Bill Tew" <<mailto:billtew@gmail.com>billtew@gmail.com<mailto:billtew@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304911104576443863077227784.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304911104576443863077227784.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If this message was misdirected, neither FNC Holding Company, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries waive any confidentiality, privilege, or trade secrets. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If this message was misdirected, neither FNC Holding Company, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries waive any confidentiality, privilege, or trade secrets. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message.
>>
>>

Confidentiality Notice: This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If this message was misdirected, neither FNC Holding Company, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries waive any confidentiality, privilege, or trade secrets. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message.